RD619 - Permanent Supportive Housing: Outcomes and Impact – December 3, 2020
Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is an evidence-based practice for adults with serious mental illness (SMI) that has been implemented, refined, and studied for more than three decades. A notable subset of individuals with SMI are unstably housed or are homeless and, as a result, have poor behavioral health outcomes and are high utilizers of costly treatment and criminal justice resources. Multiple peer-reviewed research studies, including eight randomized controlled trials, have found that PSH is particularly effective in improving participants’ housing stability and reducing their emergency department and inpatient hospital utilization.(*1)
The two core components of the PSH model are (1) affordable rental housing and (2) community-based supportive services designed to assist individuals with improving behavioral health conditions and maintaining housing. PSH is widely endorsed as a critical resource to prevent unnecessary institutional stays and facilitate discharges from institutions for persons with disabilities as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision.
In state fiscal year 2020, the Virginia General Assembly appropriated more than $17 million to DBHDS to fund permanent supportive housing for very low-income individuals with SMI. DBHDS adopted evidence-based practice standards for permanent supportive housing from the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to define the program model, operating standards, and evaluation framework for Virginia’s PSH program.
This report describes key characteristics of the program and its participants as well as statewide outcomes for the 1,129 individuals who were housed between February 6, 2016 and February 29, 2020.
Findings in this report support the value of investment in PSH for this population:
• PSH providers are effectively prioritizing individuals with extensive histories of homelessness and repeated, long-term use of institutional care before move-in.
• One hundred seventy-four individuals were discharged from a state psychiatric hospital into DBHDS PSH, and, overall, 263 individuals in PSH had a state hospital admission in the year before move-in.
• Eighty-seven percent of individuals served in PSH remained stably housed for at least one year.
• Only seven percent of those served have been discharged to an institutional setting or higher level of care.
• State hospital utilization for individuals served in PSH decreased 76 percent the year after move-in, resulting in avoided costs of $12.2 million.